Request-and-approval desk
Turn incoming business requests into clear actions, approvals and a traceable decision history.
The workshop / An application preview
Choose a system. Work with it in your environment. See the changes, checks and materials that make it yours.
Explore the proposed application with illustrative data. Switch screens and inspect a sample blueprint. There is no connected backend, live run, account or purchasable package here.
Know what it does. See what comes with it.
Turn incoming business requests into clear actions, approvals and a traceable decision history.
Use a configured application in its supported environment. This example shows incoming requests and the rules that route them.
Operating options and availability would be defined per release.Source, specifications, schemas, agent context and checks. Bring a named release into your business and adapt it with your agent.
Commercial rights, support and pricing are still undecided.The application and the change you want to make.
Require a second approval for requests above a configurable amount.
The proposed factory would update the behavior, application and acceptance checks together. The day-to-day request desk is the software it changes.
An illustrative run, paused at a human decision.
Second approval above $5,000. Different approvers required.
Example specificationApproval policy, decision record and request interface.
Example change setBoundary amounts, duplicate approvers and missing permission.
Illustrative checks · not executedA person inspects the change and its evidence before accepting it.
Decision would be requiredThe system, its context, and the means to check a change.
Download an illustrative, non-executable blueprint. Application source and commercial terms would belong to a qualified release.
A client is the interface. An executor does the work.
Terminals, agent sessions and project tools. The planned integration would bring factory activity, artifacts and decisions into the workspace.
Inspect a package, make permitted changes and return evidence. Supported clients, authentication and tool access still need qualification.
A shared view of packages, projects, runs and decisions, explored here with a sample business workflow.
Local, customer-run and hosted execution have different permissions and costs. A personal coding-agent subscription does not automatically fund hosted API calls.
The proposed journey
A business application handles everyday requests. A software factory makes a change to that application. The two have different jobs.
Inspect the outcome, dependencies, readiness and actual contents of a named release.
Use its supported behavior, or obtain the source and engineering materials under defined rights.
Make a supported change in your workspace. Keep the specification and acceptance checks with it.
See what ran, what failed and what was accepted. An approval does not silently mean a deployment.
Planned access paths
These are integration directions. Actual client support and operating requirements need qualification before a release.
Our first-party workspace brings terminals, agents and project tools together. Factory integration would expose work, artifacts and human decisions alongside them.
CLI, API and MCP interfaces would let supported coding agents inspect packages and perform permitted operations. Access, execution resources and billing remain separate choices.